Formula 1 Season 2024: The Ups and Downs of Mercedes‑AMG PETRONAS
Part I: The W15 Reset, the Hamilton Farewell, and a Season That Never Found Its Centre
Opening Context – The End Begins Before the First Race
Mercedes entered the 2024 Formula One season in an unusual state:technically hopeful, emotionally fractured, and structurally transitional.
Before a wheel was turned in anger, the defining fact of the season was already known:
Lewis Hamilton would leave Mercedes at the end of the year.
That knowledge sat over the entire campaign. Internally, externally, psychologically — 2024 was never just about lap time. It was about:
- the final year of the most successful driver‑team partnership in F1 history,
- Mercedes’ last attempt to salvage the ground‑effect era,
- and a technical reset that admitted previous philosophies had failed. [lastwordonsports.com], [racefans.net]
Organisational Foundations in 2024
Leadership: Continuity Under Strain
Mercedes’ senior leadership remained intact, but under sustained pressure:- Toto Wolff – Team Principal & CEO
- James Allison – Technical Director (returned 2023)
- John Owen – Car Design Director
- Jarrod Murphy – Aerodynamics Director
- Andrew Shovlin – Trackside Engineering Director
- Hywel Thomas – Managing Director, Power Unit (HPP)
Wolff and Allison publicly acknowledged that the team’s understanding of the 2022–2023 regulations had been flawed. The W15 would be a full philosophical relaunch, not a patch-up. [formula1.com]
The Drivers – One Foot Out the Door, One Carrying the Future
Lewis Hamilton – A Farewell Season Without Closure
Hamilton’s final Mercedes season was defined by contradiction.On one hand:
- unmatched experience,
- supreme racecraft,
- and emotional investment in leaving the team “the right way”.
- a car that frequently worked against his driving instincts,
- a development path no longer shaped around his future,
- and the unspoken reality that every success raised the question: why could this not have been given earlier?. [lastwordonsports.com], [f1i.com]
George Russell – The Driver Who Could Not Fully Take Over (Yet)
Russell began 2024 nominally as joint leader.In practice, he was:
- protecting Mercedes’ future,
- absorbing development risk,
- often taking experimental setups Hamilton avoided.
Neither driver was wrong. But the dynamic made consistency impossible.
The Car – Mercedes W15 E Performance
A Conceptual Admission of Defeat
The W15 marked the complete abandonment of Mercedes’ “zero‑sidepod” philosophy.For the first time since the ground‑effect era began, Mercedes:
- embraced a Red Bull‑style sidepod concept,
- reworked weight distribution,
- and fundamentally changed rear‑end geometry. [formula1.com], [en.wikipedia.org]
Reality: A Car With Opposing Problems
Instead, the W15 developed a notorious dual‑personality:- low‑speed understeer (“the slower you go, the less it wants to turn” – Hamilton)
- high‑speed rear instability, especially through fast directional changes. [lastwordonsports.com], [f1i.com]
- tracks like Monaco and Singapore were nightmares,
- high‑speed circuits could expose sudden grip loss,
- setup sensitivity became extreme.
Opening Rounds – Regression Before Recovery
Bahrain Grand Prix – Bahrain International Circuit
Russell qualified P3, briefly raising hopes the W15 had found a baseline.They were dashed within a stint:
- overheating tyres,
- energy deployment issues,
- steep performance drop‑off.
This was a sobering start. [lastwordonsports.com]
Saudi Arabian Grand Prix – Jeddah Corniche Circuit
Jeddah amplified the W15’s failings:- fast corners punished rear instability,
- traction zones exposed balance inconsistency.
Australian Grand Prix – Albert Park
The low point arrived early.Both Mercedes cars retired in Australia, delivering a double DNF that shattered remaining optimism. Early‑season execution, usually Mercedes’ strength, collapsed.
This race cemented the truth: the W15 was not a clean step forward. It was a compromise laden with unresolved issues.
First Glimmers – Isolated High Points
Despite the grim opening, the season offered flashes:- China Sprint – Hamilton finished second
- Montreal upgrades later delivered podiums
- engineers began to understand temperature sensitivity windows
The Structural Problem Revealed
By the end of the opening phase, Mercedes understood something uncomfortable:- The W15 was track‑specific, not adaptable
- Development gains changed balance rather than improving it
- The car worked around limits, not through them
Closing of Part I – A Season Without Direction (Yet)
Mercedes did not enter 2024 lacking effort or intelligence.They entered lacking conceptual certainty.
The W15 could win races — but not on demand, not predictably, and not sustainably. And looming over everything was the approaching end of the Hamilton era, removing the emotional safety net that once absorbed technical failure.
The question heading into mid‑season was simple:
Could Mercedes salvage significance from a broken season — or would 2024 become merely a waiting room for 2025 and 2026?
Coming in
- Austria: Russell’s first win
- Silverstone: Hamilton’s emotional victory
- Spa: controversy and dual success
- The illusion of a mid‑season revival